Arvind Kejriwal, national convenor of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), questioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi on India's oil import policies during a news conference [1].
The critique comes as the party seeks to highlight the economic burden on citizens following a series of rapid price increases for fuel. By challenging the central government's procurement strategy, Kejriwal aims to pressure the administration to seek cheaper energy alternatives to stabilize domestic markets.
Speaking in New Delhi on May 25, 2026, Kejriwal focused on the frequency of recent cost adjustments [1]. He said there had been a fourth hike in fuel prices within two weeks [1]. This volatility in pricing served as the catalyst for his demands for greater transparency in how the government manages energy imports.
"What is preventing PM Modi from buying oil and gas from Russia, Iran?" Kejriwal said [1].
Beyond energy policy, Kejriwal addressed the political standing of his party and current legal challenges. He said that no government has ever received as much love after four and a half years in office as the AAP government is receiving today.
Kejriwal also used the platform to address allegations regarding party finances. He said the party was present to clear any doubts about the donation scandal, and assure the public of transparency. This effort to project an image of openness follows a period of intense scrutiny over the party's funding mechanisms.
The news conference highlighted a dual strategy for the AAP: attacking the central government on national economic issues while simultaneously defending its own administrative record and financial integrity.
“"What is preventing PM Modi from buying oil and gas from Russia, Iran?"”
This confrontation underscores the ongoing tension between the AAP and the central government, utilizing energy costs as a populist lever. By specifically naming Russia and Iran, Kejriwal is pushing for a more aggressive non-aligned procurement strategy to lower costs, while attempting to pivot the public narrative away from internal party donation scandals and toward the Prime Minister's economic management.
