Cheetahs in India's Kuno National Park were tranquilized 110 times between 2022 and 2024 [1], according to internal inspection reports [2].

These figures highlight the significant management challenges facing Project Cheetah. Frequent sedation suggests a struggle to keep the reintroduced cats within park boundaries and maintain their health in a new environment.

The reports indicate that the sedatives were administered for three primary reasons: general animal management, necessary medical interventions, and efforts to prevent the cheetahs from straying into human-occupied areas [2]. This high frequency of tranquilization reflects the volatility of the animals' adaptation process in Madhya Pradesh.

Monitoring efforts have tracked several specific animals, including individuals KP-2, KP-3, and KAP12 [1]. Some of these cheetahs have repeatedly crossed borders into neighboring regions. In one instance, the cheetah known as KP-2 spent more than three weeks in Rajasthan's Ranthambore area [3] before being tranquilized and returned to the park.

Wildlife officials said they used these interventions to ensure the animals do not enter areas where they could pose a risk to humans or be injured by livestock and vehicles. The movement of cheetahs into Rajasthan has necessitated cross-border rescue operations to shift the animals back to their designated habitat [1].

The data from the first two years of the project underscores the intensive human intervention required to sustain the population. While the project aims for a self-sustaining wild population, the reliance on chemical restraint for movement control remains a critical operational hurdle [2].

Cheetahs in India's Kuno National Park were tranquilized 110 times between 2022 and 2024.

The high volume of tranquilization events indicates that the cheetahs are not yet acclimated to the Kuno National Park boundaries. The tendency of the animals to migrate toward Rajasthan suggests that the current reserve may not meet all their territorial needs or that the animals lack a strong biological anchor to the site, necessitating costly and risky human interventions to prevent human-wildlife conflict.