Former West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee appeared at the Calcutta High Court wearing lawyer's robes to argue a public-interest litigation case [1, 2].
This appearance marks a rare legal intervention by the Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader, who is now personally contesting allegations of violence following the 2026 Assembly election [1]. The case centers on claims of post-poll instability and the targeting of political workers.
Banerjee appeared in the gown to raise specific questions regarding the proceedings of the public-interest litigation [1, 2]. She sought protection for TMC workers and contested allegations that political rivals targeted party offices and members after the election results were announced [1, 2].
The proceedings follow the 2026 [1] state election, which has been marred by reports of clashes and violence. By appearing in professional legal attire, the former chief minister signaled a direct engagement with the judiciary to defend her party's interests and challenge the narrative of the PIL [1, 2].
Legal observers said the appearance was unusual, as political leaders typically represent their interests through appointed legal counsel rather than appearing in attire associated with the bar [1, 2]. The court is now tasked with reviewing the demands for protection, and the validity of the violence claims presented by both sides [1].
“Mamata Banerjee appeared in lawyer's robes at the Calcutta High Court”
Banerjee's decision to appear in legal attire suggests a strategic shift toward a more personal and visible defense of the TMC in the wake of the 2026 elections. By directly challenging the public-interest litigation, she is attempting to flip the narrative of post-poll violence from one of party culpability to one of party victimization.
