ANC Secretary General Fikile Mbalula addressed the party's Veteran's League and media on Tuesday afternoon to respond to internal criticism [1, 2, 3].

The confrontation highlights deepening divisions within the African National Congress as it attempts to maintain unity before critical electoral cycles. Internal strife involving high-ranking veterans threatens to destabilize the party's organizational structure during a sensitive transition period.

Mbalula spoke in response to criticisms leveled by ANC veteran Naledi Pandor, who has slammed the current party leadership [2]. The Secretary General used the platform to push back against these critiques and warn against the influence of competing factions within the organization [2, 3].

During the address, Mbalula focused on the necessity of rebuilding the party's internal cohesion. He said the organization must stabilize its ranks to remain competitive in the upcoming local government elections scheduled for 2026 [3].

Addressing the pressure from internal dissidents, Mbalula took a firm stance against those attempting to use leverage to influence leadership decisions. "I won't be blackmailed," Mbalula said [3].

The Secretary General's remarks come at a time when the ANC is facing significant pressure to reform its image and governance. By addressing the Veteran's League, Mbalula sought to bridge the gap between the party's historical guard, and the current administrative leadership [1, 2].

Despite the call for unity, the public nature of the disagreement with Pandor suggests that the party remains fractured. Mbalula said the focus must remain on the 2026 [3] goals to ensure the party does not lose further ground in local municipalities.

"I won't be blackmailed"

The public friction between Mbalula and Naledi Pandor indicates a struggle for the soul of the ANC, pitting current leadership against the party's established veterans. With the 2026 local elections approaching, the party's inability to resolve these factional disputes internally could signal vulnerability to opposition parties, as internal instability often correlates with decreased voter confidence in local governance.