Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, may be seeking to revive the royal title of "princess" as part of her solo ventures [1].

This potential move is significant because it highlights the ongoing tension between the Duchess's independent commercial branding and her former ties to the British monarchy. If pursued, the use of the title could alter the public and legal perception of her relationship with the royal house.

The discussion surfaced during a program on Sky News Australia titled "Triggered with Samara Gill" [2]. Commentators said that reviving the title could provide the Duchess with both personal validation and commercial benefits while she navigates challenges with her independent projects [1].

Samara Gill addressed the motivation behind such a move during the broadcast. "I think she does want the validation, but she also wants to continue to coast off, you know, the royal titles," Gill said [2].

Gill described the impact of these actions on the monarchy. "I think that’s been one of the most damning and heartbreaking things for the Royal Family to have to witness, you know, her secretly using some of the titles," Gill said [2].

These reports emerged in May 2024, coinciding with ongoing scrutiny of the Duchess's professional activities outside the U.S. [1]. The claims suggest a strategy to leverage the prestige of the royal brand to stabilize her current business trajectory.

“Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, may be seeking to revive the royal title of 'princess'.”

The speculation regarding the 'princess' title underscores the complex intersection of royal prestige and private enterprise. Because royal titles are granted and regulated by the Crown, any attempt to formally or informally revive a specific title without official sanction could lead to further diplomatic friction between the Sussexes and Buckingham Palace.