Mexico's Economy Secretary Marcelo Ebrard said the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) remains unchanged and will stay in effect until 2036 [1].

This assurance comes as the three nations navigate a complex trade landscape where stability is critical for maintaining foreign investment. The statement aims to prevent market volatility following high-level discussions regarding the long-term future of the trade pact.

Ebrard said this on July 1, 2026, following a trilateral meeting with representatives from the U.S. and Canada in Mexico City [2]. He said that the treaty continues without modifications, suggesting that the current legal framework provides sufficient security for businesses operating within the region [3].

The announcement follows reports that the U.S. decided not to automatically extend the USMCA for an additional 16 years [4]. While some reports indicate this decision may activate annual reviews and create uncertainty regarding future extensions, Ebrard said there is no reason for panic among investors [3], [5].

Mexican officials are working to maintain a favorable commercial position despite the lack of an automatic long-term renewal. The current agreement remains the cornerstone of North American trade, governing the flow of goods and services between the three partners until its scheduled review period [1].

By emphasizing the 2036 expiration date, the Mexican government is attempting to bridge the gap between the U.S. preference for shorter-term reviews and the industry's desire for multi-decade predictability [3], [4].

“The USMCA remains unchanged and will stay in effect until 2036.”

The discrepancy between Ebrard's optimism and the U.S. decision to forego a 16-year automatic extension highlights a tension in North American trade strategy. While the treaty is legally secure until 2036, the move toward more frequent reviews suggests the U.S. wants greater flexibility to renegotiate terms. For investors, this means that while immediate operations are safe, the long-term regulatory environment may be more volatile than the previous automatic-renewal model suggested.