President Javier Milei said Sunday that his government is moving toward the complete elimination of export taxes on Argentina's agricultural sector [1].

The move is critical because the agricultural industry remains a primary driver of the Argentine economy, and the removal of these taxes, known as "retenciones," has been a long-standing demand from producers to increase profitability and investment.

Speaking at the closing ceremony of the 138th [2] Exposición Rural in Palermo, Buenos Aires, Milei responded to requests from the farming sector to permanently remove the levies [1]. He said that the administration is currently on a path to liberate the sector completely [1].

While the president reaffirmed his commitment to the policy, he did not announce any new immediate measures or a specific timeline for the phase-out [3]. The lack of a concrete decree or date during the event left some sector representatives waiting for more definitive action, though Milei said that the objective remains unchanged [3].

"Estamos en camino de liberarlos por completo," Milei said [1].

The president said that the removal of export duties continues to be a central goal of his economic program [3]. This approach aligns with his broader platform of deregulation and the reduction of state intervention in the economy.

"La quita de los derechos de exportación sigue siendo un objetivo," Milei said [3].

The event on July 26 [1] served as a venue for the government to signal its ongoing support for the rural sector while managing expectations regarding the speed of tax relief. Milei said that the process of eliminating these taxes is a gradual trajectory rather than an overnight change [3].

"Estamos en camino de eliminar las retenciones," Milei said [4].

"Estamos en camino de liberarlos por completo."

Milei's rhetoric reinforces his libertarian economic agenda, but the absence of immediate new measures suggests a balancing act between political promises to the agricultural lobby and the immediate fiscal needs of the national treasury. By framing the elimination as a process rather than a sudden event, the administration maintains political alignment with the rural sector without committing to a sudden loss of state revenue.