Israel's Mossad chief David Barnea and Syrian foreign minister Faisal Mekdad held a phone call to discuss Turkish military deployments in northern Syria.

The communication reveals an unexpected layer of coordination between two adversaries during a period of heightened regional tension. It suggests that Israel sought to manage the risks of Turkish presence in the area before executing military operations on Syrian soil.

The discussion took place on Aug. 14, 2026 [1]. According to reports, the call focused on the buildup of Turkish troops in northern Syria ahead of an Israeli airstrike targeting a Syrian airbase.

Sources said the conversation served as a mechanism to coordinate or alert Syria about the Turkish military presence. The call also functioned as a channel to convey a warning from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Turkey regarding the impending strike.

Israel has frequently conducted airstrikes within Syria to target Iranian-linked assets and weapons transfers. However, the presence of Turkish forces, a NATO member, in the same region adds a layer of diplomatic and tactical complexity to these operations.

While Israel and Syria remain officially at war, this interaction highlights the pragmatic, if clandestine, communication channels that persist between intelligence and diplomatic officials to avoid unintended escalations with third-party powers.

The communication reveals an unexpected layer of coordination between two adversaries.

This interaction indicates that Israel prioritizes 'deconfliction' with regional powers like Turkey, even when operating against Syrian targets. By using the Syrian foreign minister as a conduit or a point of coordination, Israel attempted to mitigate the risk of a diplomatic or military clash with Turkey, showing that tactical necessity can temporarily override formal diplomatic hostility.