Former Internal Affairs Minister Seiichiro Murakami (LDP) criticized the formation of a new parliamentary caucus designed to support Prime Minister Takaichi's administration on Tuesday.

This internal friction highlights a growing divide within the Liberal Democratic Party as the administration seeks to consolidate power through organized loyalty. The criticism specifically targets the Kokuryoku Kenkyukai, or National Power Research Group, which is preparing for its first meeting in Tokyo on May 21 [2].

Murakami compared the new organization to the Imperial Rule Assistance Association, a wartime entity used to mobilize the Japanese public under a totalitarian regime. He questioned the necessity of such a structure in the current political climate, describing the effort as nonsensical [1].

"Why is there a need to do a meeting like the Imperial Rule Assistance Association? It is completely nonsense," Murakami said [1].

The new caucus has already attracted more than 300 members [1]. Despite the high membership numbers, Murakami said he lacked clarity regarding the group's actual objectives. He suggested that the purpose of the organization remains vague, and he questioned why members are being encouraged to join.

When asked about his own potential involvement with the group, Murakami dismissed the idea. "Why would I have to join such a thing?" he said [1].

Murakami further challenged the organizers to explain the timing and intent of the group's creation. He urged others to ask why such an organization is being established now, suggesting that the move lacks a meaningful legislative or strategic purpose [1].

"Why is there a need to do a meeting like the Imperial Rule Assistance Association? It is completely nonsense,"

By invoking the 'Imperial Rule Assistance Association,' Murakami is using a powerful historical taboo to frame the Takaichi administration's efforts as authoritarian. This suggests that the push for unity within the LDP is being perceived by some veterans not as policy alignment, but as a forced mandate of loyalty that threatens democratic deliberation within the party.