Former Attorney General Justin Muturi called for the immediate suspension and termination of a ballot-printing contract with Lykos Printing Company on Monday [1].

This challenge to the procurement process comes as Kenya prepares for its next general election. Any perceived lack of transparency in the production of voting materials can lead to widespread distrust in the final results and potential civil unrest.

Muturi said that the current contract lacks the necessary transparency required for such a critical process [1]. He said that the current arrangement could jeopardize the integrity of the 2027 [1] General Election if the government does not act to rectify the procurement flaws [2].

The call for suspension centers on the need for electoral integrity in Nairobi and across the country [1]. By demanding the cancellation of the Lykos Printing Company agreement, Muturi is pushing for a process that is open to public scrutiny, and adheres to strict procurement standards [2].

Critics of the current contract suggest that the lack of transparency in how the company was selected creates a risk of electoral fraud. Muturi said the government must prioritize the legitimacy of the vote over existing contractual obligations [1].

The former Attorney General said that the stability of the nation depends on the fairness of the upcoming polls [2]. He said that the printing of ballots is a foundational step in ensuring every citizen's vote is counted accurately [1].

“The current contract lacks the necessary transparency required for such a critical process.”

This demand highlights the recurring tension in Kenyan politics regarding the transparency of the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) and its vendors. By targeting the ballot-printing contract specifically, Muturi is signaling that the physical security and procurement of voting materials are primary vulnerabilities that could be used to challenge the legality of the 2027 results.