The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission has transferred regulatory oversight of the intrastate electricity market in Akwa Ibom State to the state regulator [1].
This shift represents a significant move toward the decentralization of Nigeria’s power sector [1]. By moving authority from the federal level to the state, the government aims to allow regional authorities to manage their own energy markets and infrastructure needs more effectively.
The transfer of power is now officially held by the Akwa Ibom State Electricity Regulatory Commission, known as AKSERC [5]. This commission will now manage the rights and regulations governing the electricity market within the state's borders [6].
Previously, the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission maintained centralized control over power regulation across the country. The handover to AKSERC marks a departure from that model, granting the state government the autonomy to oversee its own power sector operations [3].
This transition is part of a broader effort to reform how electricity is distributed and regulated across Nigeria [1]. By empowering state-level regulators, the federal government intends to create a more flexible framework for energy production and distribution, one that can respond to the specific geographic and economic demands of individual states [4].
Officials from both NERC and AKSERC have coordinated the handover to ensure the continuity of electricity market operations [7]. The move allows Akwa Ibom to implement its own regulatory standards for the intrastate market while remaining aligned with broader national goals for power stability [2].
“The Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission has transferred regulatory oversight of the intrastate electricity market in Akwa Ibom State.”
The transfer of regulatory power to AKSERC signals a shift in Nigeria's energy governance from a monolithic federal system to a fragmented, state-led approach. This decentralization may allow Akwa Ibom to attract more localized investment and tailor tariff structures to its specific economy, though it also places the burden of technical oversight and market stability directly on state-level officials.



