Netskope CEO David Miller is conducting secret interviews with managers that job candidates have intentionally omitted from their reference lists [1].
This approach challenges traditional hiring norms by bypassing the curated list of professional advocates usually provided by applicants. By seeking out individuals with whom a candidate may have clashed, the company aims to identify personality flaws or behavioral patterns that standard interviews often fail to uncover.
Miller targets former supervisors and coworkers who were not listed as references [1]. This process includes contacting individuals who had known conflicts with the candidate to determine their true work style and interpersonal dynamics [2]. The strategy serves as a personality test designed to provide a more comprehensive view of a potential hire before they are brought into the organization.
Netskope carries a valuation of 5 billion [1]. Given the scale of the company, the leadership emphasizes the need for high-quality cultural fits to maintain operational stability.
"We’re looking for a complete picture of the candidate," Miller said [2].
While most companies rely on the references provided by the candidate, this method removes the applicant's control over who speaks on their behalf. This ensures that the executive team hears perspectives from those who may have a critical or conflicting view of the candidate's performance, and behavior [1].
Job seekers are being warned that this CEO tracks down managers left off reference lists to discover what a candidate's personality is really like [2]. The practice highlights a shift toward more aggressive vetting processes in high-valuation tech firms.
“"We’re looking for a complete picture of the candidate,"”
This hiring strategy represents a move toward 'backchanneling,' where executives prioritize uncurated feedback over official references. While it may reduce the risk of hiring toxic personalities, it also raises questions about candidate privacy and the fairness of relying on potentially biased negative feedback from past conflicts.



