Analysts and commentators are questioning whether Pakistan is pursuing a "double game" by aligning with the United States and Iran simultaneously [1].

This scrutiny comes as regional tensions rise during the Iran-Israel crisis. The perceived duality in Islamabad's foreign policy could strain its relationships with neighboring powers and its Western allies if strategic intentions are seen as contradictory.

In a live broadcast from India, Arnab Goswami questioned the real intentions of the Pakistani government regarding its role in the Middle East [1]. Goswami said, "Has Pakistan played a double game? We need to decode its real intentions in the current Iran‑Israel crisis" [1].

Iranian sources and analysts have echoed these concerns, alleging that Pakistan is publicly supporting Iran while privately courting the U.S. [2]. This strategic ambiguity is viewed by some as a tactical maneuver to maintain influence across different geopolitical blocs.

Alex Vatanka, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, addressed the suspicions surrounding the country's diplomatic approach [2]. Vatanka said, "Iranian sources believe Pakistan is playing a 'double game' and is really bidding on behalf of the Americans" [2].

The debate highlights the precarious position Pakistan holds as it attempts to balance its security needs with its regional alliances. While Islamabad maintains its official diplomatic stances, the accusations from Iranian commentators suggest a growing trust deficit between the two nations.

“"Iranian sources believe Pakistan is playing a 'double game' and is really bidding on behalf of the Americans."”

The accusations of a 'double game' reflect the broader struggle of middle powers to navigate a multipolar world. By attempting to hedge its bets between the U.S. and Iran, Pakistan risks alienating both parties, potentially leaving it without a reliable strategic partner if the Iran-Israel conflict escalates further.