The Punjab provincial government has lifted mandatory 8 p.m. market closure restrictions for shops and commercial venues until June 1 [1], [2].
This policy shift comes as the region prepares for Eid-ul-Azha, a major holiday that typically drives a surge in consumer spending. By extending operational hours, the government aims to support local traders and facilitate public shopping needs during the festive lead-up.
According to a notification issued on May 15 [1], [3], the exemption applies to a wide range of businesses. The government said, “All shops, markets, shopping malls, hotels, restaurants, and food outlets are hereby exempted from the prescribed closure timings till June 1” [1].
The decision follows significant pressure from the business community. The move is a response to protests by traders and formal appeals from shopping-mall associations, and the general public [1], [2], [3]. These groups argued that the previous restrictions hindered commercial activity and limited consumer access.
While the general notification removes the 8 p.m. limit [1], reports regarding specific operating hours vary by location. In Lahore, some sources indicate that businesses may remain open until 10 p.m. [4]. This flexibility is a departure from earlier federal guidelines established on April 6 [1].
Commercial hubs in Punjab, particularly in Lahore, are expected to see increased foot traffic as the June 1 deadline approaches [1], [4]. The government has not yet specified whether these exemptions will be extended beyond the current date or if the original closure timings will be permanently revised.
““All shops, markets, shopping malls, hotels, restaurants, and food outlets are hereby exempted from the prescribed closure timings till June 1.””
This temporary regulatory relaxation highlights the tension between provincial administrative controls and the economic demands of the retail sector during peak religious holidays. By yielding to trader protests, the Punjab government is prioritizing short-term economic stimulation and social stability over the previous restrictive timing mandates.





