Russian President Vladimir Putin said Russia will not join an arms race despite adding new intermediate-range ballistic missile systems to its nuclear forces.
The announcement comes as Russia conducts large-scale military exercises with Belarus, signaling a shift in strategic capabilities that could alter the security balance in Eastern Europe.
During the drills, which involved tens of thousands of troops [1], Putin said he confirmed the launch of a new intermediate-range ballistic missile [2]. The missile was launched toward the Ukrainian city of Dnipro [2]. This deployment coincides with joint Russian-Belarusian exercises designed to demonstrate military readiness.
Putin said the decision to modernize the arsenal was a response to the "destabilising missile potential" created by U.S. and allied missile deployments [3]. He also said Ukraine's use of Western missiles was a primary driver for the updates [3].
"We will not get involved in an arms race," Putin said [1]. Despite this statement, he said that existing defenses would be unable to counter the new technology. "U.S. air-defence systems would be powerless to stop our new missile," Putin said [3].
The deployment occurs amid conflicting reports regarding international agreements. Some reports indicate Russia is no longer bound by the missile treaty [1], while other accounts state Putin said Russia would abide by nuclear arms limits for one more year after the treaty expires [1].
Putin said the modernization was a necessary defensive measure rather than an offensive escalation. He said that the new systems are intended to maintain a strategic equilibrium in the face of Western military expansion.
“"We will not get involved in an arms race."”
The introduction of intermediate-range ballistic missiles represents a significant escalation in Russia's military posture. By targeting Dnipro during joint exercises with Belarus, the Kremlin is demonstrating both the technical reach of its new weaponry and its willingness to operate near Ukrainian borders. The contradiction regarding treaty adherence suggests a volatile period of diplomatic transition where Russia may be selectively applying international arms limits to justify its modernization.





