Delhi police detained Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi on Tuesday during a protest outside the residence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi [1].

The demonstration marks a significant escalation in the opposition's efforts to hold the current administration accountable for alleged systemic failures in examination security. By targeting the Prime Minister's residence directly, the Congress party is attempting to elevate a specific administrative failure into a national crisis of leadership.

The protest took place at Lok Kalyan Marg, the site of the Prime Minister's official residence [1, 2]. Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, and several Congress MPs, including Mallikarjun Kharge and KC Venugopal, led the gathering along with other party workers [1, 3].

The group gathered to demand the resignation of Prime Minister Modi following what the party describes as a paper leak [1, 2]. The Congress party said this leak is a critical failure of governance that necessitates the leader's departure from office.

Security forces responded to the demonstration by removing the protesters from the area [2]. Police used lathi-charges and deployed tear-gas shells to disperse the crowd [1, 3]. Following the use of force, several leaders and workers were detained by the Delhi police [2, 3].

The confrontation at Lok Kalyan Marg highlights the growing tension between the ruling party and the opposition. While the government has not issued a formal response to the specific demands for resignation, the use of police force to clear the area suggests a low tolerance for protests near the Prime Minister's residence.

Delhi police detained Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi on Tuesday during a protest.

This incident underscores the strategy of the Congress party to personalize administrative failures by linking them directly to the Prime Minister. The use of force and detentions at a high-profile location like Lok Kalyan Marg serves to amplify the visibility of the paper leak controversy, transforming a policy grievance into a broader political confrontation over legitimacy and governance.