President Cyril Ramaphosa said he respects a Constitutional Court ruling that revived the Section 89 impeachment process regarding the Phala Phala matter.

This ruling forces the South African Parliament to restart a legal process that could determine the president's tenure. The court's decision underscores the judiciary's role in ensuring executive accountability and prevents the legislative branch from unilaterally dismissing impeachment inquiries.

On Friday, May 8, 2026, the Constitutional Court of South Africa determined that Parliament's previous decision to stop the impeachment process was invalid [1]. The court ruled that the halt of the proceedings linked to the Phala Phala report was unconstitutional [1].

The legal challenge centers on Section 89 [2] of the Constitution, which outlines the procedures for the removal of a president. The Phala Phala matter involves allegations regarding undisclosed foreign currency found at the president's home, a case that has faced multiple legal and political hurdles.

Ramaphosa said he would cooperate with the revived proceedings [1]. He did not provide specific details on the timeline for the next steps, but the ruling effectively removes the legal shield Parliament had previously used to block the process.

Legal experts and political parties have reacted to the judgment, noting that the ruling restores the original mandate of the impeachment inquiry. The decision ensures that the findings of the Phala Phala report are subject to the full constitutional process, rather than being dismissed by a parliamentary vote.

President Cyril Ramaphosa said he respects a Constitutional Court ruling that revived the Section 89 impeachment process

The ruling represents a significant victory for judicial oversight in South Africa, signaling that parliamentary decisions cannot override constitutional mandates regarding presidential accountability. By reviving the Section 89 process, the court has shifted the Phala Phala controversy from a political debate back into a formal legal procedure, increasing the political pressure on the presidency as the proceedings resume.