Retired Navy SEAL Mike Sarraille said Iran's power infrastructure is outdated and vulnerable to potential U.S. military strikes.

This assessment comes as tensions rise between the U.S. and Iran, suggesting that targeting energy hubs could significantly degrade the Iranian government's capacity to maintain military operations.

Speaking on the Fox News program "The Big Weekend Show," Sarraille discussed the strategic implications of targeting energy facilities. He said that "Iran is behind the power curve," referring to the state of the nation's electrical grid [1].

Sarraille argued that the vulnerability of these plants represents a critical weakness in Iran's national security. He said that if the U.S. were to hit their power plants, it would cripple their ability to project force [2].

The interview, which aired on March 22, 2026 [1], focused on the potential for massive strikes against power plants and how such actions would impact the global landscape. Sarraille's analysis suggests that the age and inefficiency of the infrastructure make it a high-value target for neutralizing military capabilities without necessarily engaging in direct ground combat.

By focusing on the energy sector, Sarraille said that the U.S. could disrupt the command and control systems necessary for Iran to mobilize its forces. This approach targets the foundational requirements of modern warfare, electricity and communication, rather than focusing solely on traditional military assets like tanks or aircraft.

The discussion occurred amid a broader debate regarding the effectiveness of targeted strikes in achieving long-term geopolitical stability. Sarraille's perspective emphasizes the tactical advantage provided by the current state of Iranian infrastructure.

Iran is behind the power curve.

The assessment by a former special operations officer highlights a shift toward 'infrastructure warfare,' where the goal is to neutralize a state's ability to function by targeting its power grid. If Iran's grid is indeed outdated, it creates a strategic asymmetry that the U.S. could exploit to limit Iran's regional influence without a full-scale invasion.