A dentist in Rivne, Ukraine, has returned to clinical practice after previously being convicted for assaulting child patients [1, 2].

This development raises significant concerns regarding medical licensing oversight and the safety of minors in healthcare settings. The return of a practitioner with a history of violence against children suggests a potential gap in the regulatory framework meant to protect vulnerable patients.

Inna Kravchuk was previously convicted for hitting and choking children who were under her care [1, 2]. These events occurred in 2021, approximately five years ago [1]. Following the legal proceedings, her medical license was annulled to prevent further harm to the public [1, 2].

Despite the previous legal sanctions and the loss of her credentials, reports indicate that Kravchuk resumed her dental practice in 2024 [1, 2]. The circumstances surrounding how she was permitted to return to the profession remain unclear. Public outcry has grown as Kravchuk has continued to promote her professional services on social media platforms [2].

"She is not ashamed to advertise her activities on social networks and this outrages many," a host for the program "My — Ukraine" said [2].

The case has sparked widespread indignation in Rivne and across the country. Critics argue that the ability of a convicted abuser to resume a medical practice undermines the judicial system, and the authority of medical licensing boards [1, 2].

Local reports emphasize that the case was once a national scandal, yet the practitioner managed to avoid permanent exclusion from the field [1]. The continued operation of her practice serves as a focal point for those demanding stricter vetting processes for healthcare providers in Ukraine.

Inna Kravchuk was previously convicted for hitting and choking children who were under her care

This situation highlights a critical failure in the enforcement of professional bans within the Ukrainian healthcare system. When a practitioner can bypass a license annulment and return to treating patients—especially children—it indicates that the mechanisms for tracking professional misconduct and criminal convictions are not sufficiently integrated with current licensing registries.