U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) said a potential nuclear deal with Iran could still be a few days away [1].

This development highlights a volatile strategy of simultaneous military pressure and diplomatic negotiation. The timing of the strikes suggests the U.S. is utilizing kinetic force to maintain leverage as talks regarding Iran's nuclear capabilities continue.

Rubio said the comments in Washington, D.C., while the U.S. military conducted fresh defensive strikes in southern Iran [2]. A U.S. Department of Defense spokesperson said the United States carried out defensive strikes in southern Iran in response to hostile actions [3].

Despite the military escalation, Rubio said that negotiations are still moving forward. "We are making progress, but a deal could still take a few days," Rubio said [1].

The strikes in southern Iran occurred as the administration attempts to balance the threat of force with the goal of a diplomatic resolution [2]. Rubio said that while the U.S. continues to pursue a solution, it will not happen overnight [4].

Officials have not specified the number of strikes conducted in the region [3]. The U.S. maintains that these actions were defensive in nature, though the timing coincides with the critical window for the nuclear agreement [2].

Rubio's remarks serve to temper expectations for a swift resolution. By signaling that a deal may be days away, the senator suggests that the diplomatic process remains fragile and subject to the outcomes of current military engagements [1].

"We are making progress, but a deal could still take a few days."

The simultaneous use of defensive military strikes and diplomatic signaling suggests a 'maximum pressure' approach. By maintaining military operations in southern Iran while negotiating a nuclear deal, the U.S. is attempting to force concessions from Tehran. The gap of 'a few days' represents a critical window where further military escalation could either accelerate a deal or collapse the diplomatic framework entirely.