Russian motorists are converting gasoline-powered cars to liquefied petroleum gas as Ukrainian drone strikes on oil refineries disrupt domestic fuel supplies [1, 2].

This shift highlights the growing vulnerability of Russia's internal energy infrastructure. As gasoline becomes scarce and prices rise, citizens are forced to modify their vehicles to maintain basic mobility and avoid long queues at filling stations [1, 4].

Conversion workshops, including Garant-Gas and Medvedev GBO, have seen a surge in business [1]. Demand for these modifications has increased fivefold [1]. Some workshops now report waiting lists of approximately two weeks for customers seeking to install LPG systems [1].

The financial incentive for the switch is twofold. First, the cost of LPG is roughly half the price of petrol [1]. Second, the availability of LPG provides a reliable alternative to the volatile gasoline market created by the ongoing conflict [1, 2].

The cost to convert a vehicle is roughly $2,000 [1]. Despite the initial investment, many drivers view the expense as necessary given the instability at Rosneft pumps and other regional stations [1, 3].

Ukrainian drone attacks have targeted refineries to degrade the Russian military's logistics and domestic fuel stability [4]. These strikes have led to widespread shortages and forced the government to manage erratic fuel distributions [1, 2].

Motorists in major cities and regional hubs are now relying on these workshops to bypass the gasoline crisis [1, 3]. The trend reflects a broader adaptation to the economic pressures of the war, where private citizens must find technical workarounds to sustain their daily commutes [1, 2].

Demand for LPG conversions has surged fivefold

The pivot to LPG indicates that Ukrainian strategic strikes on refineries are achieving a tangible domestic impact. By disrupting the gasoline supply chain, these attacks create internal economic friction and force the Russian civilian population to seek costly alternatives, potentially increasing public dissatisfaction with the state's ability to protect critical infrastructure.