President Claudia Sheinbaum said the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) should use its institutional autonomy to resolve a controversy regarding digital admission exam fraud [1].
The decision defines the boundary between federal oversight and academic independence during a period of scrutiny over the university's entrance process. By refusing to lead the investigation, the presidency avoids a direct clash with one of the nation's most influential academic institutions.
Sheinbaum addressed the allegations of fraud surrounding the digital exams used for student intake. She said that the university possesses the internal mechanisms, and legal standing, to investigate the irregularities without external interference [1]. This approach maintains the traditional separation between the executive branch and the university's governing body.
While the president is stepping back from a leading role, she did not completely detach the government from the situation. She said that federal resources remain available if the university requests them to solve the crisis [1].
Regarding the potential involvement of the Secretariat of Public Education (SEP), the president said that the agency or other government departments would provide assistance if requested, but only as a form of support [1].
This stance prevents the federal government from assuming responsibility for the outcome of the probe. By framing the SEP's role as secondary, the administration ensures that the final determination of fraud or innocence rests solely with the UNAM administration [1].
“President Claudia Sheinbaum said the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) should use its institutional autonomy to resolve a controversy regarding digital admission exam fraud.”
This move reinforces the legal and cultural principle of university autonomy in Mexico. By offering support through the SEP without taking command, Sheinbaum is shielding her administration from potential political fallout if the investigation reveals systemic failures, while still appearing cooperative to the public.



