Siddaramaiah, a senior leader of the Indian National Congress and MLA in Karnataka, said the Constitution is his religion [1].
The statement underscores a strategic effort to align his political identity with secular legal frameworks while appealing to the electorate in a state often marked by communal tension. By framing the Constitution as a spiritual or moral guide, he positions himself as a defender of democratic values against ideological opponents.
During his address, Siddaramaiah said the voters are his "abhimani devaru" [1]. He emphasized that his primary commitment remains to the people of Karnataka and the legal foundations of the Indian state. This rhetoric serves to consolidate his base among those who view constitutional adherence as the primary safeguard against religious polarization.
Siddaramaiah also pledged to continue his tenure as a Member of the Legislative Assembly [1]. He said that he will remain in the role to actively fight communal forces within the state. This commitment suggests a long-term strategy to maintain a legislative presence and challenge the growth of right-wing influence in the region.
His focus on the Constitution as a personal creed is intended to bridge the gap between legal governance and the deep-seated cultural and religious identities of the voters. By elevating the law to the status of a religion, he attempts to create a unifying identity that transcends specific caste or creed divisions, a move designed to broaden the appeal of the Congress party in the state.
Siddaramaiah said that fighting communalism is a necessity for the stability of Karnataka [1]. He said that the protection of the Constitution is the only way to ensure the rights of all citizens regardless of their background.
“The Constitution is my religion and voters are my abhimani devaru.”
This rhetoric reflects a broader trend within the Indian National Congress to pivot toward 'constitutional patriotism.' By framing the legal document as a sacred text, Siddaramaiah is attempting to counter the religious narratives of his opponents with a secular alternative that still utilizes the language of faith and devotion to resonate with the electorate.
