Simone Tebet (PSB), a pre-candidate for the Senate in São Paulo, criticized the current distribution model of parliamentary amendments in May 2026 [1].

Tebet's critique highlights a systemic tension between legislative spending power and executive governance. If the current model persists, it may further erode the ability of the central government to implement long-term national planning while increasing the risk of illicit financial activity.

Speaking on Jornal da Manhã, Tebet said the existing system of amendments empties the Executive branch [2]. She said that the lack of strategic planning in the Congress creates opportunities for corruption [1]. According to Tebet, the way funds are currently allocated bypasses necessary oversight, and undermines the structural integrity of public administration [1].

These comments come as Tebet prepares for a high-stakes election in the state of São Paulo. Recent polling indicates she is a leading candidate in the race for the Senate [3]. Specifically, data shows Tebet holds 36.6% of voting intention in the São Paulo Senate race [3].

The debate over parliamentary amendments has become a focal point for those seeking to reform Brazil's budgetary process. By targeting the lack of planning, Tebet is positioning herself as a candidate focused on institutional transparency and the restoration of executive authority over public spending [1].

Her standing in the polls suggests that her platform of administrative reform is resonating with a significant portion of the electorate in Brazil's most populous state [3]. This visibility allows her to push for a shift away from the discretionary spending models that have historically characterized the relationship between the Brazilian Congress and the presidency [1].

“The current model of distribution of parliamentary amendments empties the Executive.”

Tebet's criticism reflects a broader struggle in Brazilian politics regarding 'emendas' (amendments), where legislators exercise significant control over the federal budget. By linking these mechanisms to corruption and executive weakness, she is attempting to frame the Senate race not just as a political contest, but as a referendum on fiscal governance and transparency.