Ladakhi climate activist Sonam Wangchuk visited Rajghat in New Delhi on Monday to pay tribute to Mahatma Gandhi [1].

The visit follows the conclusion of a prolonged hunger strike intended to draw attention to the political and environmental vulnerabilities of the Ladakh region. By visiting the memorial of Gandhi, a global symbol of nonviolent resistance, Wangchuk connects his modern campaign for regional autonomy to India's historical tradition of peaceful protest.

Wangchuk was discharged on July 27, 2026 [2], from Medanta Hospital in Gurugram [3]. His release came after a hunger strike that lasted 26 days [4]. Medical staff at the facility provided the care necessary to stabilize his health before his release.

Rajghat served as the first stop for the reformer before his planned return to Ladakh [5]. The site, which marks the cremation ground of Mahatma Gandhi, often serves as a place of reflection for those engaged in social and political activism.

Reports on the specific motivations for the hunger strike vary. Some sources said the protest was a demand for constitutional safeguards for Ladakh under the Sixth Schedule [6]. Other reports said the strike was related to a paper-leak issue [7].

Wangchuk has consistently advocated for the protection of the fragile Himalayan ecosystem and the rights of the people living in the high-altitude territory. His actions continue to highlight the tension between central governance and regional demands for autonomy in the border regions of India.

Sonam Wangchuk visited Rajghat in New Delhi on Monday to pay tribute to Mahatma Gandhi.

The transition from a hospital bed to the memorial of Mahatma Gandhi underscores a strategic use of symbolic imagery. By aligning his struggle for the Sixth Schedule—which provides for autonomous tribal districts—with Gandhian philosophy, Wangchuk frames the Ladakhi autonomy movement not as a separatist effort, but as a legitimate exercise in democratic nonviolence. The conflicting reports regarding the strike's cause suggest a multifaceted set of grievances, ranging from systemic governance failures like paper leaks to long-term constitutional protections.