The Democratic Party of Korea unilaterally elected 11 standing committee chairs for the second half of the 22nd National Assembly [1].

This move accelerates the majority party's ability to push through legislation, but it risks a total legislative stalemate as the conservative opposition threatens to freeze all parliamentary activity.

Out of 18 total standing committees, the Democratic Party successfully appointed 11 chairs without consensus from the opposition [1]. The party said that this action is necessary to ensure the normalization of the National Assembly and to speed up the legislative process [1].

Han Byung-do, the Democratic Party's acting representative and floor leader, said, "In the second half of the 22nd National Assembly, we will ensure that irresponsible political strife and sabotage cannot take root. We will use all means and methods to complete the normalization of the National Assembly."

In response, the People Power Party, the primary conservative opposition, has expressed strong opposition to the unilateral appointments. The party is currently reviewing a full boycott of the National Assembly's official schedule, arguing that the process lacked procedural legitimacy [1].

The tension has extended beyond committee appointments to the rules of parliament itself. Discussions have emerged regarding the amendment of the National Assembly Act, specifically concerning the requirements for filibusters [1]. Such a change could potentially make it easier for the majority party to terminate opposition delays on key bills.

The conflict underscores a deepening divide in South Korean politics, where the legislative majority is attempting to bypass opposition roadblocks to enact its agenda, while the minority party views such actions as a violation of democratic norms [1].

The Democratic Party unilaterally elected 11 standing committee chairs.

The unilateral appointment of committee chairs grants the Democratic Party significant control over which bills reach the floor for a vote. By potentially amending the National Assembly Act to limit filibusters, the majority party is attempting to dismantle the primary tools the opposition uses to block legislation. This suggests a shift toward a more aggressive legislative strategy that prioritizes speed and efficiency over cross-party consensus, likely increasing political polarization in Seoul.