Legal expert Jordi Nieva said that Spanish jurisprudence has failed to correctly interpret the Penal Code regarding lobbying and influence peddling.

This critique highlights a potential gap between written law and judicial application, which can affect how high-profile corruption and influence cases are prosecuted in Spain.

Speaking on the program *El Intermedio* on May 21, 2026 [1], Nieva, a professor of Procedural Law, detailed the regulations governing the influence of private interests on public officials. He said that the courts have not accurately applied the existing legal framework to recent cases [1].

"Ha sido la jurisprudencia la que no ha acertado," Nieva said during the broadcast [1].

Nieva used current events to illustrate the inconsistency in how the law is applied. He specifically mentioned the legal proceedings involving Zapat, noting that the court's reasoning in that instance was striking [1].

The discussion occurred amid a climate of legal scrutiny in Spain. For example, reports indicate that Santos Cerdán spent one night in the Soto del Real prison on Monday, May 20, 2026 [2].

The Penal Code establishes specific penalties for influence peddling, which occurs when an individual uses their perceived influence over a public official to obtain a favorable decision. However, Nieva said that the actual practice of the courts often deviates from the legislative intent of the code [1].

Because the distinction between legal lobbying and illegal influence peddling is often narrow, Nieva's analysis suggests that the current judicial trend may be creating legal uncertainty for both public officials, and private entities [1].

"Ha sido la jurisprudencia la que no ha acertado"

The tension between the Spanish Penal Code and its judicial application suggests a systemic struggle to define the boundaries of legal political influence. If the courts continue to deviate from the strict letter of the law, it may lead to inconsistent sentencing and a lack of legal predictability for government officials and lobbyists.