Critics have released polarizing reviews for the 2026 [1] DC Universe film "Supergirl," featuring Milly Alcock and Jason Momoa.

The film serves as a critical test for the DCU franchise's ability to maintain consistency in its storytelling and character development across different superhero leads.

Opinions on the movie's quality vary significantly across major entertainment outlets. Collider said Alcock stands out as the best version of the DC superhero to date. However, Deadline said the film is a "female answer to Superman" that flies low.

Other publications were more severe in their assessments. MSN said the movie was "super-horrendous," while the NY Post said on June 24, 2026 [2], that DC has already returned to making mediocre superhero movies. These critiques suggest a divide in how the film's artistic merit is perceived.

The depiction of the lead character also drew contradictory reactions. The Sun said the version of Supergirl is a hung-over mess with greasy hair. In contrast, CNET said the film is a good, though not great, comic book adaptation with fun action.

Director Craig Gillespie helmed the project, which introduces Alcock as Kara Zor-El and Momoa as the character Lobo. While some reviewers praised the performances, others said the tone of the film missed the mark for a wide audience.

“Milly Alcock stands out as the best version of the DC superhero to date”

The stark contrast in critical reception indicates a fragmented identity for the new DCU. When a flagship film receives both high praise for its lead performance and accusations of mediocrity or poor tone, it suggests the studio may be struggling to balance niche comic book interpretations with broad commercial appeal.