Financial expert Suze Orman said that planning to work until age 65 [1] is a risky strategy for retirement.
This perspective challenges the traditional approach to long-term financial planning by highlighting the instability of employment and health. For many workers, the assumption that they can maintain a steady income until a specific age ignores the volatility of the modern professional landscape.
Orman said that relying on a fixed date for retirement creates a vulnerability in a person's financial security. She said that several factors can disrupt a career path long before a worker reaches the age of 65 [1]. These disruptions can include corporate restructuring, which often leads to employees being fired or forced into early retirement.
Beyond professional volatility, personal crises also play a significant role in financial planning. An unexpected health diagnosis or family circumstances may force a person to retire early, according to reports [2]. When these events occur, individuals who have not planned for an early exit may find themselves without sufficient savings to sustain their lifestyle.
To mitigate these risks, Orman offers strategies to help individuals retire when they want rather than when they are forced to. While the specific tips focus on flexibility, the core message is to build a financial cushion that accounts for the possibility of an unplanned departure from the workforce.
Orman said, "Planning to work until 65 is a risky strategy" [1]. This advice encourages a shift from a chronological retirement goal to a financial one, where the focus is on achieving a specific level of wealth, and stability regardless of the current year or age.
“"Planning to work until 65 is a risky strategy,"”
This advice reflects a broader shift in financial planning that prioritizes liquidity and adaptability over fixed timelines. By emphasizing the risks of corporate restructuring and health crises, Orman is advocating for a 'worst-case scenario' approach to savings, suggesting that the traditional retirement age is no longer a reliable benchmark for financial independence.



