Kalyan Banerjee, a Member of Parliament for the Trinamool Congress (TMC), defended the assault of journalists during a protest in Delhi [1].

The comments raise concerns regarding press freedom and the safety of reporters covering political demonstrations in India. By justifying physical violence against the media, a sitting lawmaker suggests that certain journalistic inquiries may warrant aggressive responses.

The incident occurred during a protest led by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) in Delhi [2]. During the event, Banerjee responded to reporters by labeling them as "Godi media"—a derogatory term often used to describe news outlets perceived as being subservient to the government [1].

Banerjee addressed the violence directed at the press, saying, "What they are doing is right" [1]. He further suggested that the presence of certain reporters was questionable based on the nature of their questioning.

"If you want to ask Godi media‑like questions, do it. I won't say anything," Banerjee said [1].

Beyond the confrontation with the media, Banerjee used the platform to criticize the current administration. He said that the actions of Narendra Modi are "unfortunate," and affirmed his support for the goals of the CJP protest [1].

This defense of physical aggression follows a pattern of increasing tension between political activists and news crews during public demonstrations. Banerjee's endorsement of the assault suggests a belief that the perceived bias of a reporter justifies a violent reaction from protesters [2].

"What they are doing is right."

The endorsement of violence against journalists by a high-ranking official like Kalyan Banerjee signals a deepening polarization in Indian political discourse. By framing the attack as a justified response to 'Godi media,' the TMC lawmaker effectively suggests that the legitimacy of a journalist's questions determines their right to physical safety, potentially emboldening protesters to use force against the press during future demonstrations.