President Donald Trump said Sunday that he agreed to cancel or postpone a planned U.S. attack on Iran [1], [2].

This development signals a shift toward diplomatic leverage in a high-tension region where a direct military confrontation could trigger a wider conflict. By linking the suspension of military action to the speed of negotiations, the administration is placing immediate pressure on Tehran to reach a deal.

Trump said the update through a statement posted on his Truth Social platform [1]. The nature of the military halt varies across reports; some sources describe the move as a full cancellation of the attack [1], while others characterize it as a postponement or suspension [2], [3].

According to the Al Yaum report, Trump said he agreed to delay the strike on the condition that a rapid agreement is reached [2]. This conditional approach suggests that the military option remains a viable tool of the administration if diplomatic efforts fail.

Further reports indicate that the U.S. and Israel have agreed to suspend the attack [3]. This coordination suggests a strategic alignment between Washington and Tel Aviv regarding the timing and execution of potential strikes against Iranian interests.

Trump said the decision depends on the ability to reach a quick agreement with Iran [1], [2]. The administration has not yet specified the exact terms of the agreement required to ensure the attack is permanently canceled rather than merely delayed.

“I agreed to cancel the attack on Iran”

This move represents a 'maximum pressure' diplomatic tactic, using the immediate threat of military force as a bargaining chip. By publicly announcing a suspension rather than a permanent cancellation, the U.S. maintains a credible military threat while providing a narrow window for Iran to make concessions. The involvement of Israel indicates that any eventual strike would likely be a coordinated effort, making the current diplomatic window critical for regional stability.