President Donald Trump said Friday that Iran must agree to never develop a nuclear weapon and immediately reopen the Strait of Hormuz without tolls [1].

These demands come as the U.S. attempts to pressure Iran into a cease-fire and nuclear non-proliferation commitments to restore free navigation in one of the world's most critical shipping lanes [1, 2].

The statement followed a two-hour meeting in the White House Situation Room [3]. Trump said, "Iran must agree to never have a nuclear weapon and to reopen the Strait of Hormuz immediately, without tolls" [1]. This diplomatic push follows a period of escalating tension, including two military clashes in recent days [4].

Despite the public demands, the status of a formal agreement remains unclear. Vice President JD Vance said it is "TBD whether Trump will endorse the deal" [2]. This uncertainty persists even as a senior administration official said Trump suggested on social media he was ready to make a decision [5].

The administration is balancing these public requirements against a tentative framework for a deal. While some reports indicate the president has issued clear demands to move forward, other accounts suggest he has put off a final determination on the proposal [1, 5].

The Strait of Hormuz is a primary chokepoint for global oil transit. The demand for the removal of tolls is intended to ensure that international trade is not disrupted by Iranian maritime restrictions. The U.S. continues to seek a resolution that combines immediate regional stability, and long-term nuclear disarmament [1, 2].

"Iran must agree to never have a nuclear weapon and to reopen the Strait of Hormuz immediately, without tolls."

The divergence between President Trump's public demands and internal reports regarding the deal's endorsement suggests a strategy of 'maximum pressure' diplomacy. By publicly setting high stakes—specifically nuclear disarmament and the free flow of the Strait of Hormuz—the administration may be attempting to leverage Iran's economic and political vulnerabilities before committing to a formal framework.