President Donald Trump said a peace agreement with Iran is very possible, though he will not rush the negotiations.
The outcome of these talks could determine the stability of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global shipping lane, and influence the diplomatic atmosphere ahead of a planned U.S. visit to China.
Trump said the current diplomatic efforts are very good conversations [2]. While he expressed optimism about reaching a deal, he also maintained a stance of military readiness. He said that if Iran does not agree to the conditions, the U.S. will increase the intensity of attacks [3].
Reports on the pace of these talks have been inconsistent. Some reports from May 7, 2026, suggested that the president was accelerating negotiations to resolve the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz before his trip to China [4]. However, Trump said he would not rush the process [7].
This dual approach of diplomatic optimism and military threat is a central part of the administration's strategy. Trump said that a deal is very possible [1], but he has not ruled out the use of force to ensure Iranian compliance with U.S. demands.
The president's remarks come as markets have reportedly reacted with relief to rumors of a potential agreement [6]. Despite this, officials and analysts have expressed doubts regarding the likelihood of a final settlement given the conflicting demands of both nations [1].
“"There are very good conversations with Iran and I see an agreement as very possible."”
The administration is employing a 'maximum pressure' strategy by pairing diplomatic incentives with the threat of escalated military action. By signaling both a willingness to negotiate and a readiness to strike, the US seeks to force concessions from Tehran while attempting to stabilize regional tensions before high-profile diplomatic summits in Asia.
