President Donald Trump said he was dissatisfied with the latest Iranian proposal to end conflict and reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

The rejection of the plan threatens to derail diplomatic efforts to stabilize one of the world's most critical oil transit chokepoints. If negotiations fail, the risk of renewed hostilities in the region increases, potentially impacting global energy markets.

Trump expressed his frustration during the final days of April 2026 [1]. He specifically targeted the terms regarding the maritime corridor and the current state of the Iranian government.

"We are not satisfied with the proposal. Iran is still figuring out its leadership," Trump said [2].

The president's dissatisfaction extends to the technical details of the peace plan. He said to his advisers, "I am not satisfied with the latest plan to reopen the Strait of Hormuz" [1]. These statements come as the two nations navigate a weeks-long ceasefire [4] intended to create space for a permanent resolution.

Discussions have taken place in Washington, D.C., and Dubai [2, 3]. Despite these efforts, the U.S. administration believes the current Iranian offer does not meet its expectations regarding the terms for ending hostilities [1, 2].

Trump had previously indicated his disapproval as early as Friday, April 26, when he said, "I am not satisfied with the Iranian proposal" [3]. The continued stalemate suggests a significant gap between the demands of the U.S., and the concessions Iran is willing to make.

"We are not satisfied with the proposal. Iran is still figuring out its leadership,"

The U.S. refusal to accept the latest Iranian proposal indicates that the administration is prioritizing a fundamental shift in Iranian leadership or a more comprehensive security guarantee over a quick diplomatic win. By linking the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz to the internal stability and leadership of Iran, the U.S. is leveraging economic and maritime pressure to force more significant concessions from Tehran.