U.S. President Donald Trump shook hands with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing without employing his characteristic aggressive greeting style.
The interaction is significant because it marks a departure from the physical tactics Trump typically uses to establish dominance during diplomatic encounters. Observers are analyzing whether this shift indicates a change in the diplomatic dynamic between the two superpowers.
According to a body language expert cited by Newsweek, Trump made no attempt to exercise his standard “yank-shake” [1]. In that specific maneuver, the U.S. president typically pulls the other person off balance to appear more powerful and resolute [1]. By omitting this gesture, the expert said Trump broke his typical power-play tradition [1].
This deviation suggests a different approach to the meeting in Beijing. The same expert said that while Trump likes to think of himself as the past master of power-play, in Xi he appeared to have found his match [1]. The absence of the aggressive shake was interpreted as a sign that Trump may have been showing respect or conceding to Xi's presence.
However, other observers viewed the interaction differently. A guest on Fox News said that President Trump had control of the room [2]. This perspective contradicts the analysis that the softer handshake represented a loss of dominance or a concession of power.
The meeting took place amid high-stakes talks in the Chinese capital [3]. While the physical greeting was brief, the lack of the “yank-shake” remains a focal point for those studying the non-verbal communication between the two leaders.
“Trump makes no attempt to exercise his standard “yank-shake””
The contrast between these interpretations highlights the tension in US-China relations. While some analysts see the lack of a power-play handshake as a diplomatic concession or a sign of mutual respect, others view it as a controlled, strategic choice. This suggests that the perception of strength in these meetings often depends on whether the observer prioritizes traditional dominance or strategic restraint.




