The Turkish Grand National Assembly adopted a 12-article law proposal designed to strengthen national solidarity and social integration [1].

The legislation serves as a legislative pillar for the "Terörsüz Türkiye" initiative, which seeks to establish a Turkey without terrorism. By codifying measures for social cohesion, the government aims to stabilize internal security and foster long-term peace across different social strata.

The proposal, titled "Milli Dayanışma ve Toplumsal Bütünleşmenin Güçlendirilmesine Dair Kanun Teklifi," passed the General Assembly of the Turkish Parliament with 468 votes in favor [1]. The law consists of 12 articles [1] that outline the framework for the state's approach to national unity.

Lawmakers said the measure is intended to unify the public under a shared national identity while addressing the root causes of social fragmentation. The adoption of the bill marks a formal transition from policy discussion to legal implementation regarding the integration process.

Following the vote, the next phase of the process will depend on an upcoming report from the National Security Council. This report will provide the strategic guidance necessary to determine how the new law is applied on the ground and which specific security measures will accompany the integration efforts [1].

The General Assembly's decision reflects a broad legislative consensus on the necessity of the "Terörsüz Türkiye" process. The scale of the vote indicates significant support for the government's current trajectory regarding national security and social policy.

The Turkish Grand National Assembly adopted a 12-article law proposal designed to strengthen national solidarity.

The passage of this law indicates that the Turkish government is shifting its counter-terrorism strategy toward a more integrated approach that combines security with social policy. By linking national solidarity to the 'Turkey without terrorism' goal, the state is signaling that legal and social integration are now viewed as essential components of national security. The reliance on a forthcoming National Security Council report suggests that while the legal framework is now in place, the operational execution remains under tight centralized control.