The Madhya Pradesh High Court ordered the preservation of Twisha Sharma's body and a second autopsy following allegations of a dowry-related homicide [2].

This judicial intervention comes as the victim's family seeks further forensic evidence to prove the death was not natural. The case highlights the ongoing legal struggle to secure convictions in dowry-related deaths in India.

Samarth Singh, the husband of Sharma, reportedly withdrew his anticipatory bail plea [2]. This move follows a period of legal volatility regarding his status. Some reports indicate Singh filed for anticipatory bail nine days after the alleged death [1]. While other accounts suggest the plea remained active or was challenged after a rejection, the court's recent focus has shifted to the preservation of physical evidence [1], [2].

The principal bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Jabalpur heard the plea from Sharma's parents [2]. They requested a second autopsy to ensure a thorough investigation into the cause of death. The court granted this request, ensuring that the body is preserved for the medical examination [2].

Singh has been described in some reports as absconding while the legal proceedings unfolded [1]. The investigation centers on whether the death was a result of harassment for dowry, a crime strictly prohibited under Indian law.

The court's decision to allow a second autopsy provides a critical opportunity for the prosecution to gather more precise forensic data. This step is often necessary when the initial autopsy is contested by the victim's family or when the circumstances of death are suspicious [2].

The Madhya Pradesh High Court ordered the preservation of Twisha Sharma's body and a second autopsy.

The court's order to preserve the body and conduct a second autopsy suggests a judicial caution regarding the initial forensic findings. By prioritizing the integrity of the evidence over the bail status of the accused, the court is ensuring that the medical cause of death is definitively established before the trial proceeds, which is essential in dowry-death cases where the burden of proof often rests on specific forensic markers of foul play.