The University of Buenos Aires hosted a virtual academic debate on April 24, 2026 [1], focusing on the challenge of listening to victims in criminal proceedings.
This discussion addresses a critical gap in the penal system, where the experience of the victim is often secondary to the procedural requirements of the state. Improving these mechanisms is intended to ensure that those harmed by crimes receive better accompaniment, and a more central role in the pursuit of justice.
Five panelists participated in the event [1]. The group included federal judge Julián Ercolini and Matías Bagnato, who joined other experts to analyze how the judiciary can evolve its approach to victim interaction. The debate centered on the necessity of strengthening the emotional and legal support provided to individuals navigating the complexities of the criminal justice process.
The event was held virtually, allowing for a broader academic exchange regarding the systemic barriers that prevent victims from being heard effectively. Participants explored the tension between the rights of the accused and the necessity of a victim-centered approach in modern jurisprudence.
While the university has recently been the site of other activities, including student elections and faculty protests regarding funding, this specific academic session focused exclusively on legal reform and human rights. The organizers said that listening to the victim is not merely a formality but a core component of a fair trial.
By examining the current failures of the penal system, the panelists aimed to propose frameworks that reduce the trauma associated with legal testimonies. The goal is to move toward a system where the victim is viewed as an active participant rather than a mere source of evidence [1].
“The debate centered on the necessity of strengthening the emotional and legal support provided to individuals.”
This debate reflects a growing global trend in legal scholarship toward 'victimology,' shifting the focus of criminal law from a binary conflict between the state and the defendant to a more inclusive process. By integrating these perspectives at a major institution like the University of Buenos Aires, the legal community is signaling a push for systemic changes in how judicial systems handle trauma and witness testimony.
