Ukraine is expanding its drone campaign inside Russia to strengthen its position ahead of expected U.S.-backed talks next week [1].

These developments are critical because they alter the bargaining power of Kyiv as it enters negotiations with Russia. While military momentum may shift, the fundamental disagreements over territorial control remain a primary obstacle to a lasting peace.

Andrew Kramer of The New York Times said that Ukraine's expanding drone campaign inside Russia and shifting battlefield momentum are strengthening Kyiv's position. He said that President Donald Trump's increasingly supportive tone reflects changing political and military realities [1].

Despite these gains, the path to a resolution remains difficult. Kramer said that the expected talks offer a chance to restart stalled negotiations, but major disagreements over control of the Donbas region continue to block progress [1].

Reports on the current state of leverage are mixed. While some indicators suggest Kyiv is gaining an advantage through its aerial campaign, other reports indicate that Russia continues to report battlefield gains ahead of the summit [1]. Additionally, some analysis suggests Ukraine may be entering these talks without the leverage that new missiles would provide [1].

Kyiv continues to utilize long-range drone strikes to pressure the Russian interior. This strategy aims to create a more favorable environment for the upcoming diplomatic efforts, though the Donbas remains the central point of contention [1].

Ukraine's expanding drone campaign inside Russia and shifting battlefield momentum are strengthening Kyiv's position

The upcoming talks represent a pivotal moment where military pressure is being used as a diplomatic tool. By expanding drone strikes into Russian territory, Ukraine is attempting to shift the cost of the war for the Kremlin, potentially forcing a more flexible approach to the Donbas dispute. However, the contradictory reports on battlefield gains suggest that neither side has achieved a decisive military advantage, meaning the outcome of the US-backed talks will likely depend on political will as much as tactical momentum.