The United States and its allies are conducting missile strikes and air-defense operations against Iran following Iranian attacks on Bahrain and Kuwait [1, 2].

The intensity of the conflict is raising concerns about the long-term readiness of the U.S. military. Analysts said that the sustained use of high-end munitions is depleting stockpiles that cannot be quickly replenished [3, 4].

Hostilities escalated on Feb. 28, 2026, with the launch of Operation Epic Fury [5]. Since that time, the conflict has expanded across the Middle East, involving Iranian airspace, the Persian Gulf, and neighboring states [1, 2].

Recent reports from June 2 indicated that Iran fired missiles at Bahrain and Kuwait, though those projectiles either failed or were shot down [1]. In response, the U.S. has engaged in self-defense strikes to neutralize threats and protect regional stability [2].

While the U.S. maintains a significant military advantage, the rate of weapon consumption is a growing concern. Some reports said that replacing the spent high-end weapons will take several years [5]. This timeline suggests a potential gap in capability if the conflict continues at its current pace [3, 4].

The conflict involves primary state actors including the U.S., Iran, and Israel [1, 2, 5]. The operational strain is not limited to missiles but extends to the broader air-defense infrastructure required to intercept Iranian strikes [2].

Replacing the spent high-end weapons will take several years.

The depletion of precision-guided munitions highlights a critical vulnerability in the U.S. defense industrial base. While the U.S. possesses superior technology, the inability to rapidly mass-produce high-end weapons during a high-intensity conflict could limit strategic options or force a reliance on lower-precision alternatives, potentially altering the calculus of deterrence in the Persian Gulf.