U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer announced proposed tariffs of up to 12.5% [1] on imports from China, India, and other economies over forced-labor concerns.

These measures signal a significant escalation in the U.S. effort to purge forced labor from global supply chains. By targeting a wide array of nations, the U.S. is attempting to force international compliance with labor standards through economic pressure.

During an interview on Bloomberg's "Asia Trade" program on July 15, 2024 [4], Greer discussed the findings of the Section 301 investigation. He said that the U.S. currently runs a trade surplus with Switzerland and referenced a proposed bilateral pact regarding rare earths. Greer said that compliance from China remains imperfect.

The proposed tariffs target 60 economies [3] based on their approach to labor prohibitions. For economies that have not adopted a forced-labor prohibition, the U.S. proposes a tariff rate of 12.5% [1]. For those that have adopted such prohibitions, the proposed rate is 10% [2].

Greer addressed the tension this creates for international partners. He said, "We are not telling other countries to choose between the U.S. or China."

Despite this statement, Greer said allies are hesitating to align with the U.S. regarding China. The administration is pushing for more coordinated action among partners to counter Chinese trade practices, a move that risks straining diplomatic ties with nations reluctant to jeopardize their own trade with Beijing.

"We are not telling other countries to choose between the U.S. or China."

The use of Section 301 to target 60 different economies indicates a shift from bilateral trade disputes to a systemic overhaul of global labor standards. By creating a tiered tariff system based on a country's domestic forced-labor laws, the U.S. is effectively using its market power to export its legal framework for human rights. This approach places allies in a difficult position, as they must either adopt U.S.-aligned labor laws or face economic penalties, complicating the U.S. goal of a unified front against China.