U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said any military action against U.S. forces or Gulf states will meet a swift and decisive response from President Trump [1, 2].

The warning signals a high-alert posture in the Middle East as tensions escalate over maritime transit fees and regional damages. This stance aims to deter Iranian aggression by linking military consequences to financial leverage.

Bessent said the remarks during testimony before the House Committee on Ways and Means in June 2026 [2]. Speaking from the Longworth House Office Building in Washington, D.C., the Treasury Secretary framed the U.S. position as one of active deterrence [2].

Central to the dispute are the costs associated with damages in the Gulf and the fees for crossing the Strait of Hormuz. Bessent said the U.S. intends to use frozen Iranian assets to settle these costs [2].

"Frozen Iranian assets will pay for the damages caused to the Gulf and the fees for crossing the Strait of Hormuz," Bessent said [2].

The Secretary's testimony highlights a strategy that combines economic pressure with the threat of military force. By explicitly mentioning the president's readiness to act, the Treasury Department is aligning financial sanctions with national security objectives [1, 2].

The House Committee session focused on the intersection of economic policy and regional stability. The administration's approach suggests that the frozen assets are no longer just sanctions tools, but are now viewed as a source of reparations for regional disruptions [2].

Any military action against U.S. forces or Gulf states will meet a swift and decisive response.

The U.S. is shifting from a policy of containment to one of active financial and military deterrence. By tying frozen assets to specific regional damages and transit fees, the administration is treating Iranian assets as a liability fund for regional allies, which increases the risk of escalation if Tehran perceives these moves as theft or illegal seizure.