Vietnam President To Lam said the Asia-Pacific region requires responsible commitments from all parties rather than the mere presence of major powers [1].
This position signals a desire for stability and predictable engagement in a region where tensions between global superpowers often threaten local security and trade. By emphasizing commitment over presence, the Vietnamese leader is advocating for a diplomatic framework that prioritizes regional stability over geopolitical competition.
Speaking at a defense forum in Singapore on May 29, 2026, To Lam addressed the role of global powers in the region [1, 2]. He said the Asia-Pacific seeks neither the presence nor the absence of a major power, but instead "responsible commitment" from all parties [1].
To Lam linked the necessity of this stability to current global conflicts. He said the war in the Middle East has shown how important strategic waterways can be to the world as a whole [2]. The president used this comparison to warn that instability in critical maritime routes can have far-reaching consequences for international commerce and security [2].
His remarks come as nations in the Asia-Pacific continue to navigate the influence of competing interests in the South China Sea and other strategic corridors. The call for a responsible approach suggests a push for a rules-based order where major powers adhere to international norms, rather than exerting influence through unilateral action.
Throughout the summit, the focus remained on how regional actors can maintain autonomy while engaging with external powers. To Lam's insistence on responsibility suggests that Vietnam seeks a balanced approach to foreign relations—one that avoids taking sides while demanding accountability from the world's most powerful militaries.
“"responsible commitment" from all parties”
President To Lam's comments reflect Vietnam's strategic 'bamboo diplomacy,' which seeks to maintain flexible and balanced relations with all major powers. By citing the Middle East, he is highlighting the fragility of global supply chains and the high cost of maritime instability, urging superpowers to prioritize regional stability over strategic dominance to avoid similar disruptions in Asia.




