Romeu Zema has publicly criticized Flávio Bolsonaro, creating political tension that threatens right-wing alliances in Minas Gerais [1, 2].

This friction complicates the strategy of Mateus Simões, who has worked to forge a broad coalition among conservative leaders. The stability of this front is critical for regional electoral success, but the public rift suggests a fragmentation of the right-wing base.

The tension emerged over the past few weeks, intensifying in late April 2026 [1]. Zema's criticisms are rooted in disagreements over the political strategy employed by Bolsonaro and the fallout from the Banco Master crisis [1]. These disputes have made it more difficult for Simões to maintain a cohesive front in the state.

Despite the friction, there is significant overlap in voter support. Data indicates that 76% of Zema's voters would support Flávio Bolsonaro in a second-round election [3]. This numerical alignment suggests that while the leadership is divided, the electorate remains largely synchronized.

Reports from Estadão said the clash has reduced pressure on the Novo party and is eroding the coalition Simões attempted to build [1]. However, Simões offered a different perspective in an interview with MSN, where he said that supporting Zema as a vice president for Flávio Bolsonaro would facilitate his life [2].

The conflicting accounts highlight the precarious nature of the alliance. While Simões continues to signal a willingness to align both figures, Zema's public distance from Bolsonaro's strategy creates a barrier to a formal agreement.

Zema's criticisms are rooted in disagreements over the political strategy employed by Bolsonaro.

The disconnect between voter alignment and leadership cooperation creates a strategic vacuum in Minas Gerais. While the electorate shows a strong preference for both Zema and Bolsonaro, the personal and strategic disputes between the candidates prevent the formation of a unified ticket, potentially leaving the right-wing vote split or disorganized heading into the next electoral cycle.